ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF FIXED DOSE QUININE SULFATE TABLETS SOLD IN BUSHENYI BASED ON THE BP SPECIFICATIONS

  • Type: Project
  • Department: Pharmaceutical Science
  • Project ID: PHS0070
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 100 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 553
  • Report This work

For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................................................ 1

APPROVAL .•••.••••••••.•.••••••.••••••..•.•••••..••••••.•••••••.••••••.•.•••.••.•••••.•••••.••••.••.•••••..•..•..•...••.•..•.•••..•.....•..•••.•.•••.•••••.•.••..••••• II

DEDICATION ......................................................................................................................................................... Iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................................................................................... IV

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ V

OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS .................................................................................................................. Vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................ ,.. ........................................................... VIIi

ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................. 1

CHAPTER ONE ....................................................................................................................................................... Z

INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 2

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 2

1.1 8ACKGROUNDTOTHESTUDY .............................................................................................................................. 2

1.2 PROULEM STATEMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 3

1.3 JUSTIFICATION OF THE :lTlJDY .............................................................................................................................. 4

1.4. STUDY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................. 5

1.4.1. GENERAL OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................... 5

I .4.2. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 5

1.5 RESEAI

1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................................................................... S

l. 7 CONCEPTUAL FLAME WORK ............................................................................................................................... 6

CHAPTER TWO ..... ~ ................................................................................................................................................. 7

LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................. 7

2.0 INTROOliCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 7

2.! KNOWLED

2.2 A TTJTUDES Of RUH.AL iviOTHERS ABO\JT JMMUNlZA !'!ON •........................... ., .................................................... 8

2.3 PRACTICES OF MOTHERS TOWARDS IMI>oJliNlZATION .......................................................................................... 9

CHAPTER THREE ................................................................................................................................................... 11

METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... 11

3.0. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 11

3.1. STUDY AREA ..................................................................................................................................................... 11

3.2. STUDY DESIGN .................................................................................................................................................. 11

3.3. STUDY PERIOD ................................................................................................................................................. 12

3.4. STUDY POPULATION ......................................................................................................................................... 12

3.5. SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION ........................................................................................................................ 12

3.6. SAMPLE TECJ-INIQIJES ..................................................................................................................................... 13

3.7. SAMPLING STRATEGY ................................................................................................................................. 13

viii

3. 7.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA ................. ................. .. ............... .... ...... . ......................................................... 13

3.7.2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA ..•........•................................•.•............................................................................... 13

3.8. DEFINITION OF VARIABLES ........•..•......•.........................•.•...................••.............•..................•.......................... 13

3.8.1. THE INDEPENDENT VARIABLES ..•.••.....••........•........•......••.•.........•....•••.••............•............•............................... 13

3.8.2. THE DEPENDENT VARIABLES .....•...............•.........•..........................................•....................................•......... 13

3.1 0. DATA COLLECTION .•......•..........•.........•...............•.......•................................................................•.................. 14

3 .II. DATA ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT ...............................................................•............................................ 14

3.!2. DATA PRESENTATIONS .............•.........•.•..................•.................................................................•.............•.. 14

3.13 ETHICALCONSIDERATIONS •.........•.•................................•...................................•..•...............................•••....••. 14

3.14 STUDY LIMITATIONS AND REMEDIES ..............••.••................•......•••......•......•.....••.•.......••••.......••.......•..............•. 15

3.15. DISSEMINATION Of RESULTS ••...•............•........•......•.•....•......•..•••.....••.....•..•.•.••.......••.............•..•..................... 15

CHAPTER FOUR .................................................................................................................................................... 16

RESUlTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 16

4.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. :l6

4.!.0. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARAC ,-cRISTICS ............................................................................................................... 16

4.1. 1: Distribution of respondents according to their demographic chacteristics ............................................ 16

4.1.2 Knowledge of Mother's on Immunization ................................................................................................ 18

4. 1.3 Distribution of mothers according to knowiedge about the definition of immunization ......................... 18

4.2.2 Distribution of mothers according to the source ofkno\vtedge on immunization .................................... 19

4.2.3 Distribution of mothers according to knov..-ledge abotJt wh·.::re rnothers mke their chiidr~n fur

inlJnunization .................................................................................................................................................. 19

4.2.4 Distribution of mothers according to knowledge ofditferent immunizable diseases in children of0-5

years of age. IF65 .............................................................................................................................................. 20

4.2.5 Distribution of mothers according to knowledge about correct earliest age ofimmunization .................. 21

4.2. 6 Distribution of mothers according knowledge on last age for immunization ........................................ 21

4.3. ATflTUDE OF MOTHERS ABOUT IMMUNJZAT!ON ............................................................................. 22

4.3.1: Distribution of mothers according to belief about importance of immunization ..................................... 22

4.3.2: Distribution of mothers according to benefits of immunization n=65 ..................................................... 22

4.3.3: Distribution of mothers according to belief about Safety of vaccines n=65 .......................................... 23

4.3.4: Distribution of mothers according to reasons for vaccines being unsafe ................................................. 23

4.3.5 Distribution of mothers according to days when immunization is done. n=65 ........................................ 24

4.3.6. Distribution of mothers according to convcnie11ce of date and place fbr immunization. n=61 ................ 24

4.4.0. MOTIIER'S PRACTICES ON IM,tlJNI7.ATION .................................................................................................... 25

4.4. 1: Distribution of mothers according to immunization status of children. n=-=65 ......................................... 25

4.4.2: Jrnrnunization practices in relation to distance between different households and immunization centers .

........................................................................................................................................................................... 26

4.4.3: Distribution of mothers according to reasons fbrno immunization/partial immunization. n=i7 ............ 26

3.4.4: Distribution of mothers according to availability of child health card. n=60 ......................................... 28

4.4.5: Distribution mothers according to reasons for no card ............................................................................ 28

4.4.6: Participation of mothers in immunization Jxaclices irt relation to their it~vel ofeducation ...................... 29

4.4.7: Distribution of mothers on how they were handled by vaccination team ................................................ 30

n=60 ................................................................................................................................................................... 30

4.4.8. Distribution of mothers according to charges for immunization services n=60 ....................................... 30

CHAPTER FIVE ...................................................................................................................................................... 31

DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, CONClUSION •\ND R£COMMEIIIDATION5 .................................................................. 31

ix

5. I DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................................. 31

5.1.2. Demographic characteristics of respondents .......................................................................................... 31

5.1.3 Knowledge of Mothers about Immunization . .......................................................................................... 31

5.1.4. ATTITUDE OF MOTHERS ON IMMUNIZATION .............................................................................. 32

5.1.4. PRACTICES OF MOTHERS ON IMMUNIZATION ........................................................................ 33

5.2.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................... 35

5.3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................... 35

REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................................... 36

APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................................ .40

APPENDIX 1: CONSENT FORM .............................................................................................................................. .40

APPENDIX II: ........................................................................................................................................................ .41

QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................................................................................................. .41

APPENDIX Ill: ........................................................................................................................................................ 46

INTRODUCTORY LETTER ........................................................................................................................................ 46

APPENfliX IV .......................................................................................................................................................... 47

BUDGET ................................................................................................................................................................ 47

APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................................................ .48

WORK PLAN ......................................................................................................................................................... 48

APPENDIX Vl ........................................................................................................................................... , ............ .49

MAP OF UGANDA ................................................................................................................................................ .49

APPENDIX VII ........................................................................................................................................................ SO

MAP OF KISORO DISTRICT ......................................................................................................................... ., ......... 50

ABSTRACT Immunization involves the process of making children immune or resista.11t to an infectious disease typically by administration of a vaccine. It is one of the most cost effective public health interventions for reducing child mortality and morbidity hence it is the best investment a country can make to ensure a healthy population. Globally it saves about 2-3 million lives annually and provides one of the least expensive tools for preventing childhood vaccine preventable diseases, avoiding costs of curative care. The study was a descriptive cross-sectional study on knowledge attitude and practices of mothers towards immunization of children aged 0-5 years in Mugwata village, Gisozi parish Muramba Sub County, Kisoro district. The general objective was to determine the knowledge. attitude and practices of mothers towards immunization of children of aged 0-5 years. The specific objectives were: to assess knowledge of the rural mothers about immunization, to study the attitudes of rural mothers towards immunization. and to determine the practices of mothers on immunization of children aged 0-5 years. Both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection were employed. A questionnaire with both closed and open ended questions was used and 65 respondents were sampled. Results: There study observed a high knowledge on immunization, 96.9% of the mothers were able to define immunization approp1iately, 93.8% identified benefits of immunization and at least every mother mentioned one immunizable disease. Poliomyelitis and measles were the most known vaccine preventable disease. However. the study revealed that there was lack of knowledge on the correct earliest age and last age for immunization of children 0-5 years of age. Only 66.2% knew the correct earliest age of immunization and only 21.5% of moth

ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF FIXED DOSE QUININE SULFATE TABLETS SOLD IN BUSHENYI BASED ON THE BP SPECIFICATIONS
For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Share This
  • Type: Project
  • Department: Pharmaceutical Science
  • Project ID: PHS0070
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 100 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 553
Payment Instruction
Bank payment for Nigerians, Make a payment of ₦ 5,000 to

Bank GTBANK
gtbank
Account Name Obiaks Business Venture
Account Number 0211074565

Bitcoin: Make a payment of 0.0005 to

Bitcoin(Btc)

btc wallet
Copy to clipboard Copy text

500
Leave a comment...

    Details

    Type Project
    Department Pharmaceutical Science
    Project ID PHS0070
    Fee ₦5,000 ($14)
    No of Pages 100 Pages
    Format Microsoft Word

    Related Works

      ABSTRACT In an effort to ensure stable availability of good and safe water supply in all state of the federation (Nigeria), the production of packaged water (sachet and bottled water) was born; this has become the most available and affordable alternative to the general population. Hence compliment the inadequate supply of pipe borne water in... Continue Reading
    Nine samples of freshly prepared kunu was taken from local vendors and hawkers at Tanke area, Ilorin, Kara State and analyzed for microbial quality. The pH of the samples ranged from 2.66 to 4.06. The total bacterial count ranged from 1.5×104 to 7.4×104 cfu/ml; the total coliform count ranged from 1.0x102 to 8.0x103cfu/ml; the faecal coliform... Continue Reading
    Nine samples of freshly prepared kunu was taken from local vendors and hawkers at Tanke area, Ilorin, Kara State and analyzed for microbial quality. The pH of the samples ranged from 2.66 to 4.06. The total bacterial count ranged from 1.5×104 to 7.4×104 cfu/ml; the total coliform count ranged from 1.0x102 to 8.0x103cfu/ml; the faecal coliform... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT Jackground: Diclofenac is one of the most commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory lrugs (NSAIDs) for the treatment of pain, rheumatism and other inflammatory conditions.Aim: ~his study aimed to investigate whether the selected brands of diclofenac sodium meet heir label specifications as well as the BP 2009.Materials and Methods:... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The microbiological assessment of Garri, sold in two different markets in Benin  City metropolis, was carried out using the pour plate technique. The mean total  count ranged from 15.0 to 29.4 × 104  cfu/g in Oba market and Santana market  respectively. A total of six organisms were identified in Santana Market samples  while a... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT Twenty samples of frozen chicken from five different sellers were analyzed to determine their bacteriological load; the samples were collected from Gwagwalada market. All the frozen chicken samples from the five sellers examined were contaminated with some bacterial... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The microbiological assessment of Garri, sold in two different markets in Benin City metropolis, was carried out using the pour plate technique. The mean total count ranged from 15.0 to 29.4 × 104 cfu/g in Oba market and Santana market respectively. A total of six organisms were identified in Santana Market samples while a total of ten... Continue Reading
    Bacteria are group of microorganisms all of which lack a distinct nuclear membrane (and hence are considered more primitive than animal and plant cells) and of most which have a cell wall of unique composition. Most bacteria are unicellular; the cells maybe spherical (coccu), rod-shaped (bacillus), spiral (spirillum), comma-shaped (vibrio) or... Continue Reading
    Bacteria are group of microorganisms all of which lack a distinct nuclear membrane (and hence are considered more primitive than animal and plant cells) and of most which have a cell wall of unique composition. Most bacteria are unicellular; the cells maybe spherical (coccu), rod-shaped (bacillus), spiral (spirillum), comma-shaped (vibrio) or... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT Radiation absorbed dose for patients undergoing myocardial perfusion has been calculated for technetium-99m Hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropyl-isonitrile (99mTcSestamibi) at the Nuclear Medicine Department of Abdou Moumouni University. Thirty patients were scanned and image quantification was achieved using MedisoInterViewXP® software. An... Continue Reading
    Call Us
    whatsappWhatsApp Us