A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-INTERVENTION

  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0478
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 57 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 478
  • Report This work

For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DECLARATION ...................................................................................................................... i

APPROVAL ............................................................................................................................ ii

DEDICATION ....................................................................................................................... iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...................................................................................................... iv

LIST OF CASES ...................................................................................................................... v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... vi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. viii

ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... ix

CHAPTER ONE ..................................................................................................................... l

GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. !

1.1 Background ofStudy .......................................................................................................... 1

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ............................................................................ 7

1.3 AIM AND OBffiCTIVES OF STUDY .............................................................................. 7

1.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................. 7

1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY ............................................................................................ 8

1.6 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ................................................................................................ 8

1.7 RESEACH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 8

1.8 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................... 8

1.9 ORGANIZATION LAYOUT .................................................................................... 10

CHAPTER TW0 .................................................................................................................. 12

PRINCIPLE OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY ....................................................................... 12

2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 12

2.1 THE EVOLUTION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY ..................... 15

2.2 THE CONCEPT OF STATE SOVEREINTY ................................................................. 19

2.3 TYPOLOGIES OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY ................................................................. 20

2.3.1 ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGNTY ..................................................................................... 20

2.3.2 INTERNAL SOVEREIGNTY ...................................................................................... 21

2.3.3 EXTERNAL SOVEREIGNTY ..................................................................................... 21

vi

2.3.4 DE JURE AND DE FACTO SOVEREIGNTY ............................................................ 22

2.4 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 24

CHAPTER THREE ............................................................................................................. 25

THE DOCTRINE OF NON-INTERVENTION ................................................................ 25

3.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 25

3.1 EVOLUTON OF THE DOCTRINE OF NON-INTERFERENCE ................................ .25

3.2 ANALYSIS OF RELATED CONCEPTS ....................................................................... 27

3.3 NON-INTERVENTION PRINCIPLE ........................................................................ 28

3.4 NON-INTERVENTION IN THE UN CHARTER .......................................................... 29 ·

3.4.1 FORCE ......................................................................................................................... .30

3.4.2 THREAT OF FORCE ............................................................................................. .31

3.5 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... .32

CHAPTER FOUR ................................................................................................................ 34

EMERGING LIMITS TO INTERVENTION DOCTRINE ............................................ 34

4.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 34

4.1 HUMANITATRIAN INTERVENTION ......................................................................... 34

4.2 RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT ................................................................................. 37

4.3 PEACE KEEPING AND PEACE ENFORCEMENT ..................................................... 39

4.5 THE USE OF FORCE TO PROTECT NATIONALS ABROAD .................................. .40

4.5 LAWFUL COUNTER-MEASURE BY A STATE ....................................... : ................ .41

4.6 AID TO ENFORCE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION ........................................ .42

4.7 SELF DEFENCE ............................................................................................................. .42

4.8 THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTE ............................................................... .44

4.9 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................... .44

CHAPTER FIVE ................................................................................................................. .45

5.1 CONLUSION ................................................................................................................. .45

5.2 RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................................... 45

REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 47

ABSTRACT Non-intervention is a rule of international law that restricts the ability of outside states to interfere with the internal affairs of other states. Non-intervention is derived from the inviolability of state's sovereignty. This principle is rooted in Article 2 of the United Nations Charter. Nevertheless, there are recognized instances where other states may legitimately interfere with the internal affairs of another state. Investigating this situation and ascertaining where the lawful intervention may constitute the bedrock of this study. The study adopts the doctrinal research methodology and thus uses relevant primary and secondary materials. The study fmds that lawful intervention may be undertaken where there are gross violation of human rights, and under the authorization of United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF NON-INTERVENTION
For more Info, call us on
+234 8130 686 500
or
+234 8093 423 853

Share This
  • Type: Project
  • Department: Law
  • Project ID: LAW0478
  • Access Fee: ₦5,000 ($14)
  • Pages: 57 Pages
  • Format: Microsoft Word
  • Views: 478
Payment Instruction
Bank payment for Nigerians, Make a payment of ₦ 5,000 to

Bank GTBANK
gtbank
Account Name Obiaks Business Venture
Account Number 0211074565

Bitcoin: Make a payment of 0.0005 to

Bitcoin(Btc)

btc wallet
Copy to clipboard Copy text

500
Leave a comment...

    Details

    Type Project
    Department Law
    Project ID LAW0478
    Fee ₦5,000 ($14)
    No of Pages 57 Pages
    Format Microsoft Word

    Related Works

    TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ...................................................................................................................... i APPROVAL ............................................................................................................................ ii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
    A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF KARL POPPER’S FALSIFICATION PRINCIPLE ABSTRACT Karl popper was concerned with distinguishing science from pseudo-science; as well as a criterion of truth in science; and consequently his rejection of the verifiability principle of meaning since it does not adequately demarcate scientific statements, including majorly... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The study was carried out on the examination of the letter of credit and the fi'aud exception principle. In this case the research expounded the documentary credits and its effectiveness in relation to the prescribed laws and the provisions of the conventions against the documentary credits. A letter of credit is a financial device... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The research is about the analysis of the law of armed conflicts and how the international intervention strikes a balance. The main objective of the study is to critically analyse the law of armed conflict and how to strike a balance on the humanitarian intervention. The study will also look into the use of force, define what humanitarian... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT John Rawls’ “A theory of justice” published in 1971, changed contemporary political theory. In the book, John Rawls presented a reformulation of the social contract theory of John Locke, Jean Jacque Rosseau and Immanuel Kant, providing a justification of the liberal... Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ............................................................................................................................ i APPROVAL .................................................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Ill IV v vi vii 1.1 Background of the Study I 1.2 Statement of the Problem 9 1.3 Significance of the Study I 0 1.4 Objectives I 0 1.4.1 General Objectives I 0 1.4.2 Specific Objectives II 1.5 Res~arch Questions II 1.6 Scope of the Study II 1.6.1 Geographical scope II 1.6.2 Content scope I I 1.6.3 Time scope II CHAPTER TWO 2.1... Continue Reading
    TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION .......................................... .................................................................................. i APPROVAL .................................................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION... Continue Reading
    Abstract Local governments are not sovereign unlike independent nation-states. It is a subordinate government, which derives its existence and power from law enacted by a superior government. The nature and structure of transactions or interactions between the three tiers of government determine the degree of autonomy. Local government in Nigeria... Continue Reading
    ABSTRACT The main purpose of this research work was to examine the Federal Character Principle and Quota System in Nigeria and its relationship with the recruitment exercise in the public service. This was prompted by the fact that there is growing disenchantment in some quarters about the implementation of the federal character principle and... Continue Reading
    Call Us
    whatsappWhatsApp Us