A LEGAL AND JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS OF HOMOSEXUALITY AND SAME SEX MARRIAGES: SUPPORTING THE NIGERIAN POSITIION
ABSTRACT
APPROVAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Approval iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgement v
Table of Contents vii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Definition of Homosexuality 1
1.2 Who is a Homosexual? 16
1.3 What is Marriage? 18
1.4 Forms of Same-Sex Marriages 26
1.5 Same-Sex Marriage in Contradistinction with Purpose
of Marriage in the Ordinary Sense 30
CHAPTER TWO: LAW AND MORALITY IN RELATION TO HOMOSEXUALITY AND SAME MARRIAGES
2.1 The Moral Implication of Homosexuality and Same-Sex
Marriage 35
2.2 Moral Implication of Homosexuality in Nigeria 47
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 Anti-Homosexuality and Same-Sex Marriage
Legislations in Nigeria 56
3.2 Attempts by the Nigerian Legislature and People
to Stopping the Scourge 59
CHAPTER FOUR: OPINION ACROSS THE WORLD
4.1 Social and Legal View Point of Homosexuality
Around the World History 68
4.2 Social and Legal View Point of Homosexuality
in America 72
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion 78
5.2 Recommendations 81
Bibliography 82
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 DEFINITION OF HOMOSEXUALITY
Homosexuality is romantic or sexual attraction or behavior between members of the same sex or gender. As an orientation, homosexuality refers to “an enduring pattern of or disposition to experience sexual, affectionate, or romantic attractions” primarily or exclusively to people of the same sex; “it also refers to an individual’s sense of personal and social identity based on those attractions, behaviours expressing them, and membership in a community of others who share them.” [1]
Homosexuality is one of the three main categories of sexual orientation, along with bisexuality and heterosexuality, within the heterosexual-homosexual continuum (with sexuality sometimes considered a fourth). Scientific and medical understanding is that sexual orientation is not a choice, but rather a complex interplay of biological and environmental factors, especially with regard to early uterine environment.[2] While there are those who still hold the view that homosexual activity is “unnatural” or “dysfunctional”[3] research has shown that homosexuality is an example of normal variation in human sexuality and is not in and of itself a source of negative psychological effects. Prejudice and discrimination against homosexual and bisexual people, however, have been shown to cause psychological harm.[4]
The most common terms for homosexual people are lesbian for females and gay for males, though gay is also used to refer generally to both homosexual males and females. The number of people as gay or lesbian and the proportion of people who have same-sex sexual experiences – are difficult for researchers to estimate reliably for a variety of reasons.[5] According to major studies, 2% to 10% of people have had some form of same-sex sexual contact within their lifetime.[6] In a 2006 study, 20% of respondents anonymously reported some homosexual feelings, although only 2-3% identified themselves as homosexual. Homosexual behavior is also observed in many non-human animal species.[7]
Many gay and lesbian people are in committed same-sex relationships, though only recently have census forms and political conditions facilitated their visibility and enumeration.[8] These relationships are equivalent to heterosexual relationships in essential psychological respects.[9] Homosexual relationships and acts have been admired, as well as condemned, throughout recorded history, depending on the form they took and the culture in which they occurred. Since the end of the 19th century, there has been a global movement towards increased visibility, recognition and legal rights for homosexual people, including the rights to marriage and civil unions, adoption and parenting, employment, military service, equal access to health care, and the introduction of anti-bullying legislation to protect LGBT minors.
Societal attitudes towards same-sex relationships have varied over time and place, from expecting males to engage in same-sex relationships, to casual integration, through acceptance, to seeing the practice as a minor sin, repressing it through law enforcement and judicial mechanisms, and to proscribing it under penalty of death.
In a detailed compilation of historical and ethnographic materials of Preindustrial Cultures, “strong disapproval of homosexuality was reported for 41% of 42 cultures; it was accepted or ignored by 21%, and 12% reported no such concept. Of 70 ethnographies, 59% reported homosexuality absent or rare in frequency and 41% reported it present or not uncommon.”[10]
In cultures influenced by Abrahamic religions, the law and the church established sodomy as a transgression against divine law or a crime against nature. The condemnation of anal sex between males, however, predates Christian belief. It was frequent in ancient Greece; “unnatural” can be traced back to Plato.[11]
Many historical figures, including Socrates, Lord Byron, Edward II, and Hadrian,[12] have had terms such as gay or bisexual applied to them; some scholars, such as Michael Foucault, have regarded this as risking the anachronistic introduction of a contemporary construction of sexuality foreign to their times, though others challenge this.[13] [1] Case No. S147999 in the Supreme Court of the State of California, in re Marriage Cases Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365(…) APA California Amicus Brief – As filed” (http://www.courts.ca.gov./documents/Amer_Ass_Amicus_Curiae_Brief.pdf page 10. Retrieved 2010-12-21.
[2] Royal College of Psychiatrists: Submission to the Church of England’s Listening Exercise on Human Sexuality. (http://www.repsych.ac.uk/pdf/submission%20the%2020Church% Church%20England,pdf)
[3] Robinson, B.A. (2010). “Divergent beliefs about the nature of homosexuality” (http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_fixe.htm).
[4] America Psychological Association: Resolution on Appropriate Affirmative Responses to Sexual Orientation Distress and Change Efforts. (http://www.apa.org/about/governance/council /policy/sexual-orientation.aspx).
[5] LeVay, Simon (1996). Queer Science; The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap/queerscience.htm).
[6] Investigators ACSF (1992). “AIDS and sexual behavior in France”. Nature 360 (6403): 407-409, doi: 10.1038/360407a0 (http://dx.doi.org/1038%2F360407a0), PMID 1448162
[7] Science Daily: Same-Sex Behaviour Seen in Nearly All Animals (http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/2009/06/0906122106.aspx)
[8] Census Statistics show quarter of California same-sex couples raising kids (http://www.mercurynews.com/census/ci_18.334802?nclick_check=1). homosexuality
[9] Case No. S147999 in the Supreme Court of the State of California, in re Marriage Cases Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365(…) APA California Amicus Brief – As filed” (http://www.courts.ca.gov./documents/Amer_Ass_Amicus_Curiae_Brief.pdf page 10. Retrieved 2010-12-21.
[10] Adolescence and puberty, by John Bancroft, June Machover Reinisch, p. 162.
[11] “…sow illegitimate and bastard seed in courtsesans, or sterile seed in males in defiance of nature.” Plato in THE LAWS (Book VIII p. 841 edition of Stephanus) or p. 340 edition of Penguin Books, 1972.
[12] Roman Homosexuality. By Craig Arthur Williams, p. 60. homosexuality
[13] Hubbard Thomas K. (2003-09-22). “Review of David M. Halperin, How to Do the History of Homosexuality”. Bryn Mawr Classical Review. homosexuality.
